Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
Putra Muskita · · 2 min read

OpenAI turmoil highlights need for ‘diversified’ AI landscape

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman at an event in Taipei in September / Photo credit: Shutterstock

Lokesh Choudhary contributed to this report.

After a highly publicized saga, Sam Altman has reclaimed his position as OpenAI’s leader. However, the recent events have elicited mixed emotions among some AI founders in Southeast Asia and India.

For Hariom Seth, founder of Indian martech company Tagglabs, it’s too early to say whether OpenAI is becoming too unpredictable. However, “if its leadership continues to be in flux, it could force startups to find alternative solutions,” he said.

Seth said he wants to know what steps OpenAI is taking to ensure that its technology remains stable and accessible.

A Singapore-based AI founder, who asked to remain anonymous, told Tech in Asia that he admires Altman but is disappointed that the CEO is back at OpenAI.

The founder had envisioned OpenAI continuing to operate in the same manner as it does with Whisper, its automatic speech recognition system, while Altman pursued a separate, large-scale for-profit venture. Whisper represents a complete open-source release.

Recent events at OpenAI may be the public manifestation of simmering internal tensions around two key issues in the AI industry: for-profit versus nonprofit motivations and the balance between innovation and safety, as observed by another Singapore-based AI entrepreneur.

Reuters reported that Altman’s initial ousting came after warnings from staff researchers about an AI discovery with potentially harmful implications for humanity.

“In a way, I’m glad that this is happening, as it will dilute the current concentration of so much innovation in one team,” the person said. “Perhaps counterintuitively, [it] may lead to a more diversified AI tech development landscape spread across different businesses.”

Somsubhra GanChouduri, co-founder and CEO at Singapore-based AI Palette, shares the same sentiment. “It is pretty clear we cannot just depend on one or two big companies to build or define responsible, ethical AI.” He expects the new board at OpenAI to have a “broader representation of investors, which may lead to prioritization of profit over responsible AI.”

“I don’t see why the open-source vs. proprietary debate has to be a zero-sum game,” said another AI firm founder based in Singapore.

In Southeast Asia, spending on AI solutions is predicted to increase from US$174 million in 2022 to US$646 million in 2026, according to an IDC InfoBrief commissioned by Dataiku.

See also: Hot or not: What SEA investors are betting on and what they’re ignoring

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

TIA Writer

Putra Muskita

Covering ecommerce and fintech for Tech in Asia. Drop me a line: 1putra.muskita@techinasia.com or Twitter @putramuskita.