Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
C. Custer ยท ยท 4 min read

Why China Canโ€™t Make Its Own Mobile OS

Chinese companies have occasionally taken a stab at producing PC operating systems โ€” StartOS is the coolest one weโ€™ve seen, though itโ€™s Linux-based โ€” but the world is still running mostly Windows, OS X and Linux, all operating systems that were developed outside China. Even in the world of smartphone operating systems, many companies have tried but none have managed anything to rival Android or iOS, and almost all of Chinaโ€™s โ€œindependentโ€ smartphone operating systems are actually Android-based.

So what gives? Yesterday, Ji Yongqing (a seasoned tech reporter and the author of several books on Chinaโ€™s IT industry), addressed the operating system problem and laid out three reasons for Chinaโ€™s failure to produce a great OS in a blog post titled โ€œWhy Chinese People Canโ€™t Produce Our Own Operating System.โ€ Itโ€™s pretty interesting, so Iโ€™ve translated the most relevant part of it โ€” Jiโ€™s three reasons for Chinaโ€™s OS gap โ€” below.

(This should be obvious, but since Iโ€™ll probably get angry comments otherwise, I should make it clear that I donโ€™t personally agree with everything Ji says here).


1. We lack basic R&D strength.

The US already has a complete โ€œgovernment-university-industryโ€ R&D supply chain: the government sets the direction, universities do the fundamental research, and industry produces the products. But our government directly orders universities and companies to produce products without researching what the best direction is for the future. Instead society is stuck in fickleness and shortsightedness, and the result is lots of money wasted and mistakes made on basic R&D and lost opportunities to overtake [the West].

For example, in the TV industry, when others were researching LCD, we were happy to be the kings of CRT. When they came out with LCD, we rushed to follow, but they had begun researching LED. Weโ€™re always behind, reactive.

Returning to operating systems, since we havenโ€™t made any contributions to the field of PC operating systems in the past, how could we now create a competitive mobile operating system with no base [to work from]? Apple and Google both have years of cumulative knowledge from PC operating systems. If no one ever plants the seed, how can we expect to cool off in the shade of a tree later down the line?

2. We lack high-end technical talent.

I heard about a Chinese company not long ago that sent people to Silicon Valley specifically to hire skilled platform developing talent. This company had run into the problem of escalation: they developed and developed until they needed a first-class platform and discovered they couldnโ€™t pull it off.

You may think thatโ€™s strange; China has so many programmers, why would you need to go to America to find talent? The problem is that Chinese programmers are a dime a dozen, but really high-end skills are impossible to find. China puts too much emphasis on profits and too little on ideals, but operating systems require a long-term investment, and the results take too long to arrive so many Chinese companies arenโ€™t willing to invest, instead always taking from the open-source Linux community but never contributing. This is also a bad influence on programmers, who as a result often arenโ€™t willing to really delve into fundamental software research, and instead prefer to work on high-profile and potentially profitable apps. Even now in the internet industry, everyone talks about product managers and no one talks about software architects, but in truth the two are equally important.

3. We lack an ecosystem.

Even if we could create our own technology standards, we couldnโ€™t promote those standards [to the world], so we could never be truly successful. To do this, weโ€™ll need to break away from the โ€œlone wolfโ€ model and head out into the world, cooperating with hardware, software, and integrated firms to create a positive [tech] ecosystem. But thatโ€™s what weโ€™re worst at; in the past weโ€™ve become used to fighting alone, always the guerrilla warrior in the shadows and never launching frontal assaults en masse. For example, even when we created some of our own technological standards like in Loongson chips, WAPI and TD-SCDMA, we were unable to create an ecosystem for them and thus the end result was failure.

Because we donโ€™t have the โ€œthree-stage rocketโ€ of basic R&D, high-end talent, and an ecosystem, our โ€œsatelliteโ€ will never reach space. Thatโ€™s why Iโ€™m pessimistic about China creating our own mobile operating system unless Huawei, Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu and other companies with real power truly set their hearts on doing this [and work together]. I think it will be quite a long time before that happens. So what should we do now? I fear we can only prop up a few of the weaker overseas operating systems to try to prevent any one from becoming too dominant.


Stay ahead in Asiaโ€™s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

๐Ÿ„ For casual readers / ๐Ÿ‘ถ Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

โŒ›Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

๐Ÿ“– For learners / ๐Ÿ‘ Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

Community Writer

C. Custer

Former editor and motion graphics artist for Tech in Asia. Currently content marketer at Dataquest.io