Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
C. Custer · · 2 min read

Foxconn workers went on strike last week, but not for the reason you think

Electronics_factory_in_Shenzhen

Last week, around 1,000 workers at Foxconn’s Chongqing plant stopped working. They made banners and demanded a meeting with management to discuss their grievances, making it clear that they wouldn’t step back on the assembly line until that happened. Their beef? They wanted to work longer hours. Foxconn wasn’t giving them enough overtime.

A Foxconn representative told the Chinese newspaper Securities Daily that the dispute was resolved after four hours of negotiations, and a much smaller follow-up protest has also been resolved. Production was not affected, and life moves on for the Chinese electronics manufacturer.

But the dispute does highlight the difficult position that Foxconn and other Chinese electronics manufacturers are in when it comes to labor. The Western press, and even the company’s Western partners, have been critical of Foxconn for violating overtime regulations and asking workers to work more hours per month than the company is meant to. But as this recent dispute indicates, reducing worker overtime can be unpopular with employees, who are accustomed to getting a lot of overtime and thus see the reduction as a de-facto pay cut.

And indeed, the overtime pay does represent a significant chunk of many workers’ income. An average Foxconn worker has a monthly salary of around RMB 2,000 (US$326). But with overtime pay, their actual take-home can end up being as high as RMB 3,000 or 4,000 a month (US$489-$652).

In this particular case, Foxconn’s overtime reduction was apparently related to a reduced order from Hewlett-Packard rather than any international pressure to reduce worker hours. But it does still illustrate the rock-and-a-hard place position the company sometimes finds itself in when it comes to meeting global standards for working conditions while still satisfying its own employees.

See: Why China’s about to get a lot more robots

(Source: Securities Daily via Sina Tech)

Editing by Terence Lee, image via Steve Jurvetson, Wikimedia Commons

(And yes, we’re serious about ethics and transparency. More information here.)

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

Community Writer

C. Custer

Former editor and motion graphics artist for Tech in Asia. Currently content marketer at Dataquest.io