Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
  • Insights
    This article was written by a TIA community member. Insights pieces undergo the same rigorous editorial process that newsroom-produced articles have.
Charmaine de Lazo · · 5 min read

VC vs revenue: Which path should your startup take?

highway-sunny

Photo credit: Pixabay

This is a Discuss post, where we feature short but insightful opinions from the Asian tech community on startup, entrepreneurship, and tech topics. Got a topic or question to suggest? Drop us an email or leave a comment.

During his talk at Tech in Asia Singapore 2018, Pebble founder Eric Migicovsky said that the first thing people should think about when starting a business is if they’re building a VC-backed or revenue-backed company. But how should founders make this decision? What are the implications if they get it wrong?

Here’s an excerpt from Migicovsky’s talk and the views of two other founders.

Editor’s note: Answers have been edited for clarity.

eric-migi

Eric Migicovsky, founder at Pebble and partner at Y Combinator

In some ways, it’s easier to build a non-VC version of the company. In hardware, people are going to buy gadgets and cool stuff. But the pitfall is when a founder starts down the revenue path, generates cash, reinvests into products, and gets lured to the VC path. Someone says, “I want to invest in your company,” then you veer off and get stuck in between the VC path and the revenue path. Then, you start spending more without maintaining profitability. So, I encourage founders to think about this right from the get-go.

On the other side, if you are taking the VC path, you’re likely building a multibillion-dollar company. You have to think about capital requirements, how the business model will work, your average sales, profit per sale, subscriptions, and all those metrics. There’s also a tendency to run into conflict with the big boys.

You have to think about those metrics too for a revenue-backed business. But if you’re building a fantastic product for a subset of people, you might not have to target growing a multibillion-dollar company and fall into the sights of Apple, Google, and the like.

One of our big problems in our company was being stuck between the VC path and the revenue path. We didn’t raise any money until we were doing US$30 million in revenue, which happened a year after our Kickstarter campaign.

We raised about US$50 million at that point without knowing we were going into the VC path. That kind of threw us off. We started spending more money, building a team faster than we were growing our revenue base. We didn’t think about the long-term funding requirements. We didn’t realize we would have to be raising hundreds of millions of dollars to compete in the market we were in. We were also faced with some big competitors.

Let’s discuss

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

Community Writer

Charmaine de Lazo

News editor at Tech in Asia