Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
  • Insights
    This article was written by a TIA community member. Insights pieces undergo the same rigorous editorial process that newsroom-produced articles have.
Eric Feng · · 9 min read

Consumer startups are dead. Long live consumer startups.

About 10 years ago, Apple first unveiled the App Store and kicked off one of the greatest periods of product innovation, entrepreneurial achievement, and disruption we’ve ever seen, namely the consumer rebellion.

Like what the internet rebellion did 10 years before, the consumer rebellion would spawn startups that evolved from tiny companies into titans of industry, all fueled by the introduction of a new computing platform: the smartphone.

Who are the members of the Rebellion? In 2009, Pinterest, WhatsApp, and Uber all launched. In 2010, Instagram and Xiaomi. In 2011, Snapchat. And in 2012, Toutiao. These are some of the most iconic consumer companies that touch more than a billion mobile users every day and have become fundamental parts of our society.

The consumer rebellion was in full force. It was unstoppable—until 2013 at least.

The golden age

To illustrate the timeline of the consumer rebellion, let’s look at data from Crunchbase. I’ve queried all consumer unicorns since 2005 and plotted them by their founding date.

As expected, there’s a steep spike starting 2009, exactly when the mobile app economy began with the App Store’s launch and the subsequent founding of consumer giants like Airbnb and Instagram. But there’s a similar steep decline in 2013. This golden age emerged from 2009 to 2012 and then declined afterward.

But maybe the picture is simply incomplete. Companies take time to develop, right? A great consumer startup founded in 2018 will take several years to mature and grow in value, so obviously there will be fewer consumer unicorns this year because of the time horizon we’re looking at.

Yes, there’s truth to this. When evaluated, there will absolutely be more than zero consumer unicorns from this current 2018 vintage. But that doesn’t explain the decline in 2013 and 2014. Those companies have had four or five years to develop by then, which is a long enough period for the winners to separate themselves.

In other words, the unicorns of 2013 and 2014 should have matured already, and they won’t change substantially even over several more years.

To illustrate this point, let’s look at the same chart but add in enterprise unicorns.

As the number of consumer unicorns declined steeply, the number of enterprise unicorns held up. In other words, enough time had passed for hit enterprise startups from 2013 and 2014 to break out, making those vintages mature.

The empire strikes back

Network effects, distribution, and talent

Consumer startups are dead. Long live consumer startups.

 

The return of the consumer rebellion

This article was first published on the author’s blog.

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

Community Writer

Eric Feng

Eric Feng is a general partner at the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins, where he invests in early stage consumer Internet startups such as BorderX Labs, Handshake, Packagd, and Hollar.