Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
Jonathan Chew · · 4 min read

Real estate tokenization isn’t worth it

Sign up for the Daily Newsletter, sent exclusively to our premium subscribers. We break down the big and messy topics of Asia’s tech and startup community. Get the newsletter in your inbox everyday with a premium subscription.

Hello reader,

The real estate market in Singapore has always been rather lucrative.

Anyone who’s living in this land-scarce country will tell you that property prices have been shooting up over the last few years, showing a clear rise in demand for housing – and that includes public housing too.

It would seem that many local investors are interested in putting their money in real estate to capture this boom. Eventually, I wouldn’t be surprised if that leads them to consider investing in higher-end properties.

Some startups are looking to enable these investors but in a slightly different way: through tokenization. However, the authors of today’s story believe that the ones and zeroes in the blockchain aren’t exactly comparable to the real thing.

Today we look at:

  • Why tokenizing real estate may not be the way to go
  • An Indian employee engagement platform raising US$4 million
  • Other newsy highlights such as AWS piloting a new carbon removal project and a Mumbai court issuing a contempt notice to Google’s CEO

Premium summary

A token investment

Image credit: Timmy Loen

At first glance, the concept of tokenizing real estate – and lowering the barrier to entry in real estate investing – might sound good. However, this story sheds some light on the potential downsides of the strategy.

  • Paper matters: One disadvantage is that blockchain tech cannot be used to legally transfer ownership of real estate. Rather, many tokenization platforms use a separate entity to purchase the property, and token holders get a fractional interest in that entity.
  • Who’s in charge?: Because there isn’t a clear ownership structure, dispute resolution can become tricky, such as when tenants or occupants have issues with property management or repair.
  • Exiting the investment: Another issue is that without a proper secondary market, the most likely way to exit the investment is for the entire property to be sold. However, doing so could cause issues if other token holders don’t agree to sell, and deal terms may be difficult to finalize.

Read more: The empty promise of real estate tokenization


Startup spotlight

A winning advantage


Subscribe now to be the first in the know for the region’s hottest tech events


Quick bytes

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

TIA Writer

Jonathan Chew

Has a strange liking for grabbing tiny plastic things on wooden walls