Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
  • Insights
    This article was written by a TIA community member. Insights pieces undergo the same rigorous editorial process that newsroom-produced articles have.
Tomas Skoumal · · 5 min read

Banks pour billions into AI, but most see no ROI. Here’s why

The private banking divisions of banks have long struggled to serve customers other than ultra-high-net-worth individuals. Tasks like portfolio research, client profiling, and compliance are simply too time-consuming to offer to any but the richest clients.

This constraint has remained despite the rapid expansion of mass affluent households across high-growth markets. In turn, it has created a big opportunity for premium banking services, yet the industry has been unable to tap it.

Image credit: Timmy Loen

AI co-pilots have emerged as a solution to this supply and demand mismatch. However, the gap between promise and revenue is wider than most banks want to admit. Here’s why.

Success stories and blockers

Some banks are applying AI within their private banking units and making revenue gains.

DBS in Singapore, for example, secured S$1 billion (US$786 million) in economic value from its AI initiatives in 2025. That’s up from S$718 million (US$564 million) in 2024, underscoring the compounding impact of AI-augmented financial advice.

To map where AI use in private banking is and isn’t translating into revenue, a report by Dyna.Ai, GXS Partners, and investment research network Smartkarma draws on executive interviews across Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.

One unnamed leading multinational bank found that delivering AI-generated portfolio insights during live client conversations – not in pre-meeting briefs – drove higher uptake and satisfaction, according to the report. This approach reduced prep time for relationship managers by 95% and contributed to 20% year-over-year sales growth.

See also: SG wealthtech platforms chase growth in fractional investing

The distinction between using AI for live client interactions and pre-meeting prep is critical in wealth management, where revenue depends on relationship managers influencing client decisions in real time. Results like these remain the exception, though.

Yet the full findings of the report are sobering. A model can be live within three months, but it can take nine months or more before relationship managers trust it enough to act on its recommendations.

Photo credit: DBS Bank

The single biggest challenge is when the C-suite doesn’t drive AI adoption. AI deployments must be championed by senior leadership to truly create impact.

Risks and dangers

What actually works

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

This is premium content. Subscribe to read the full story.

Why subscribe?

AI copilots promise scale, but most never reach the frontline. The difference comes down to workflow and revenue impact.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

10

10 company database access

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

🧠 For professionals / ⭐ Best value

CoreBest value

US$16.58US$14.92/month

Billed annually at US$179.10 on the first year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

Unlimited premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Unlimited company database access

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.55 per day

Save US$19.90 on the first year. Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

Community Writer

Tomas Skoumal

Tomas Skoumal is the chairman and co-founder of Dyna.AI, an AI-as-a-service firm.