Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

Xi Jinping in Malaysia as ASEAN faces Trump tariff

Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Malaysia on April 15, 2025 evening for a three-day state visit.

During his visit, Xi is scheduled to meet with Malaysia’s King Sultan Ibrahim Iskandar and hold discussions with Prime Minister Anwar.

The agenda includes signing agreements and addressing trade relations as Malaysia faces economic challenges from US tariffs.

Xi’s visit occurs amid heightened tensions as the US considers implementing “reciprocal” tariffs targeting Southeast Asia.

These measures could affect Malaysia’s exports, excluding semiconductors and computers, which are currently exempt.

🔗 Source: South China Morning Post


🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ From deficit to strategic partnership: The evolution of Malaysia-China trade relations

The current Malaysia-China trade relationship represents a dramatic transformation over five decades. When diplomatic ties were established in 1974, bilateral trade totaled just $159 million, compared to $108.6 billion by 2018—a 600-fold increase 1.

This growth wasn’t always balanced. Malaysia actually experienced trade deficits with China for seven consecutive years starting in 2002, peaking at $4.2 billion in 2007 2.

The relationship has evolved beyond simple trade figures to include strategic infrastructure projects like the $11.4 billion East Coast Rail Link, reflecting China’s deepening investment through the Belt and Road Initiative.

Personnel exchanges have also grown significantly, from fewer than 100,000 annually in early diplomatic years to over 4.2 million exchanges today, with Chinese tourists becoming Malaysia’s largest visitor segment at 1.47 million in 2023 1.

This evolution demonstrates how economic partnerships can transform from uneven trading relationships into comprehensive strategic frameworks that encompass infrastructure, tourism, and technology transfer.

2️⃣ ASEAN caught between competing economic powers

Southeast Asian nations face an increasingly precarious balancing act between the world’s largest economies. The region is projected to become the fourth-largest economy globally by 2050, making it a prize in great power competition 3.

US-ASEAN trade reached significant levels with $86.2 billion in exports in 2018, but came with a substantial $99.8 billion deficit that has made the region vulnerable to tariff threats 3.

Malaysia specifically faces 24% blanket tariffs on nearly all exports to the US under Trump’s proposed measures, threatening the $25 billion trade surplus it currently enjoys with America.

Companies throughout the region have already been relocating supply chains to avoid previous US-China tariff conflicts, creating complex production networks that now risk being targeted as “China’s back door” 4.

This economic positioning highlights the practical challenges of neutrality for smaller economies when caught between competing superpowers. Economic diversification provides resilience but also exposes countries to accusations of taking sides.

3️⃣ The strategic commodification of specific export sectors

Malaysia’s negotiating position with China highlights how certain industries become strategic assets in international relations beyond their pure economic value.

Palm oil exports to China, despite falling 5.3% recently to 1.4 million tonnes as Chinese consumers become more health-conscious, remain a top diplomatic priority for Malaysia seeking market access.

The country’s recent launch of the China-Malaysia Halal Food Industrial Park in Perak state demonstrates a strategic pivot to serve China’s 26 million Muslims, creating new market opportunities where Malaysia has competitive advantages 5.

Malaysia similarly aims to leverage its established position in electrical machinery and semiconductor production, which form its largest export categories to China 5.

This sector-specific approach shows how countries identify and cultivate strategic export niches that align with their competitive advantages, even as they navigate complex geopolitical relationships with much larger trading partners.

How would you feel if you could no longer use Tech in Asia?