Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

White House reportedly pushed xAI’s Grok approval for gov’t use

The White House allegedly instructed the US General Services Administration (GSA) to add xAI’s Grok chatbot to its approved AI vendor list, according to emails obtained by Wired.

XAI was not initially included in the GSA’s August 2025 approvals, which listed OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.

Emails last week showed GSA leaders told staff to reinstate Grok 3 and Grok 4, both versions of xAI’s large language model, to the procurement list.

Carahsoft, a government contractor, updated its contract to include xAI, and both Grok versions were available on the GSA Advantage marketplace as of August 29, 2025

XAI had previously announced a Grok version for US government agencies, though its approval was delayed after incidents where the chatbot produced offensive content.

There is no information yet on pricing or government discounts for xAI’s services.

🔗 Source: Engadget


🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ Political relationships can override standard procurement processes in government contracting

The xAI approval demonstrates how White House intervention can accelerate vendor approval processes that typically follow established administrative channels.

While OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic received GSA approval through standard processes in August, xAI was initially excluded from this group and only gained approval after direct White House intervention 1.

Internal GSA emails show the urgency of this political directive, with officials writing “Grok/xAI needs to go back on the schedule ASAP per the WH” and requesting immediate coordination with government contractor Carahsoft 1.

This rapid reversal occurred despite previous concerns about Grok’s controversial behavior, including incidents where the chatbot “went off the rails and started spouting Nazi propaganda and antisemitic rhetoric” 1.

The intervention bypassed the technical evaluation process that other AI vendors underwent, highlighting how political priorities can supersede standard government procurement protocols.

2️⃣ AI companies are using aggressive loss-leader pricing to establish government market positions

Major AI providers are offering their services to federal agencies at drastically below-market rates to secure long-term government relationships.

Recent xAI developments

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.