US Senator Tom Cotton has raised concerns about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan’s past investments in Chinese chip firms and a recent criminal case involving Cadence Design, where Tan was formerly CEO.

In a letter to Intel’s board chair, Cotton questioned whether the board was aware of subpoenas sent to Cadence during Tan’s tenure and whether Tan had disclosed or divested from Chinese companies linked to the military or Communist Party.

Intel is currently receiving federal funding under a Biden administration initiative to secure defense-related microelectronics.

Reuters previously reported that Tan and his venture funds had invested at least US$200 million in Chinese chip and manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2024, with some tied to the Chinese military.

A source said in April that Tan had divested, but details remain unclear.

Last week, Cadence Design agreed to plead guilty and pay over US$140 million for selling chip design tools to a Chinese military university during Tan’s leadership.

🔗 Source: Reuters

🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ Semiconductor executives face intensifying scrutiny under new investment rules

The questioning of Tan reflects a broader policy shift as the U.S. implements stricter oversight of China-related investments in the semiconductor sector.

The Treasury Department’s new Outbound Investment Security Program, taking effect January 2, 2025, specifically targets investments in semiconductors, quantum information technologies, and artificial intelligence in China, Hong Kong, and Macau 1.

This program requires notification or prohibition of certain outbound investments based on national security implications, making Tan’s $200 million in Chinese investments between 2012-2024 a key concern for lawmakers.

The timing of Cotton’s letter aligns with this regulatory shift, as companies receiving federal funding under defense initiatives face heightened disclosure requirements about executives’ foreign ties.

2️⃣ Semiconductor industry remains deeply interconnected despite trade tensions

The complexity of Tan’s situation reflects the persistent economic interdependence between U.S. and Chinese semiconductor markets, even amid escalating tensions.

Despite the ongoing tech war that has cost China $150 billion in lost exports since 2017, nearly 30% of semiconductor manufacturing machinery exported by the U.S. still goes to China 2.

Recent Intel developments