Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

US senator pushes bill for AI firms to reveal safety protocols

California State Senator Scott Wiener has proposed new legislation to regulate AI.

This comes after Governor Gavin Newsom’s veto of a similar bill last year. The amendments to Senate Bill 53 include transparency requirements for AI companies developing advanced models.

If passed, the bill would require companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic to publicly disclose their safety and security protocols.

These protocols must evaluate the potential risks associated with their technology. Companies would also need to report “critical safety incidents,” such as data breaches, to the California Attorney General.

The legislation aims to protect whistleblowers within AI organizations.

This initiative comes after recent federal developments that halted efforts to prevent states from enacting their own AI regulations.

Several major AI firms, including Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic, already publish safety guidelines voluntarily.

🔗 Source: Bloomberg


🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ California leads state-level AI regulation amid federal inaction

California’s evolving approach to AI regulation reflects a broader tension between state and federal governance in emerging technologies.

SB 53 follows a pattern established by California’s landmark Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which was initiated by real estate developer Alastair Mactaggart after a conversation with a Google engineer about data collection practices 1.

The state’s leadership in tech regulation comes as the U.S. Senate recently blocked efforts to preempt states from enacting their own AI regulations, creating space for California to set precedents that could influence national standards.

This regulatory approach mirrors historical patterns where states have served as “laboratories of democracy” in areas like privacy, environmental protection, and consumer safety before federal frameworks emerge.

SB 53’s focus on transparency requirements rather than liability represents a strategic pivot after Governor Newsom’s veto of the more stringent SB 1047, which would have held developers liable for mass casualty events caused by their AI systems 2.

2️⃣ Tech industry shapes regulation through resistance and voluntary standards

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.