Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

X updates terms to ban AI training with its data

Social media platform X has updated its developer agreement to ban using its content for training large language models.

The new clause, added under “Reverse Engineering and other Restrictions,” applies to both the API and platform content.

This move follows X’s acquisition by Elon Musk’s AI company, xAI, earlier this year.

The policy aims to block competitors from training AI with X’s data without permission.

🔗 Source: TechCrunch


🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ A corporate data access arms race is reshaping the AI landscape

X’s decision to restrict access to its data for AI training follows a growing trend among content-rich platforms protecting their information assets from competitors.

This pattern extends beyond X, with Reddit implementing similar restrictions to its API access for AI companies, forcing OpenAI to negotiate a licensing agreement reportedly worth $60 million annually1.

These moves reveal a fundamental shift in how online platforms value their data, treating it as proprietary intellectual property rather than openly accessible information.

Companies that control large datasets are increasingly recognizing them as strategic assets worth protecting, especially as the parent companies develop their own AI initiatives. For example, Elon Musk’s xAI acquiring X shortly before this policy change could be seen as part of this trend.

The restrictions reflect a growing understanding that high-quality training data represents a competitive advantage in AI development, creating incentives for companies to erect barriers around their content.

2️⃣ Legal uncertainties are driving defensive data policies

X’s developer agreement update comes amid unsettled legal questions about copyright and AI training, as highlighted by the U.S. Copyright Office’s recent report addressing whether AI training on copyrighted works constitutes fair use2.

Recent court cases have raised significant questions about AI developers’ liability when using content without explicit permission, creating a legally ambiguous landscape that platforms like X are navigating cautiously3.

This uncertainty is compelling platforms to implement restrictive policies proactively rather than risk potential legal exposure from allowing unrestricted data usage.

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.