๐งโโ๏ธ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here
TSMC CEO says US wonโt seek stake in company
TSMC chairman and CEO C.C. Wei said the US government will not seek a stake in the company, addressing concerns raised by recent media reports.
He told reporters in Taipei that the Trump administration had announced it would not take equity in TSMC.
A company spokesperson also said TSMC has never discussed US government ownership.
Earlier this week, Reuters reported the US might seek shares in chipmakers receiving CHIPS Act funding, but a US official later told the Wall Street Journal there were no such plans for TSMC or Micron.
TSMC shares fell 4.2% in Taipei after the Reuters report.
TSMC, based in Taiwan, is the worldโs largest contract chipmaker and is expanding in the US.
๐ Source: Focus Taiwan
๐ง Food for thought
1๏ธโฃ U.S. subsidies model contrasts sharply with Chinaโs state ownership approach
The equity controversy highlights fundamental differences in how the U.S. and China approach strategic technology control.
While China uses state-owned enterprises to maintain government influence in critical sectors, with SOEs playing crucial roles in defense and energy despite comprising only 15% of Fortune Global 500 companies2, the U.S. has chosen a different path through the CHIPS Act.
The $52.7 billion in federal subsidies allocated under the CHIPS Act provides grants and tax incentives rather than requiring government ownership stakes3.
This approach reflects Americaโs preference for market-based solutions while maintaining strategic oversight, contrasting with Chinaโs more direct state control model where the government retains intervention options in critical sectors2.
The U.S. strategy aims to achieve national security objectives through financial incentives rather than ownership, allowing private companies to maintain independence while serving national interests.
2๏ธโฃ TSMCโs foundry dominance makes government influence attempts inevitable
TSMCโs overwhelming market position explains why the mere suggestion of U.S. government equity sparked such strong market reactions and diplomatic clarification.




