Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

P&G to cut 7,000 jobs, exit brands as uncertainty grows

Procter & Gamble (P&G) plans to reduce its workforce by 7,000 jobs over the next two years.

This reduction represents about 6% of its total staff and is part of a broader restructuring initiative to address economic challenges.

The company will exit selected product categories and brands in certain markets to navigate economic and geopolitical headwinds.

Executives cited global instability and rising consumer uncertainty, adding that tariffs could cost the company US$600 million before tax by 2026.

The restructuring includes streamlining operations, reducing team sizes, and incurring up to US$1.6 billion in charges, with a quarter being non-cash.

P&G has previously exited markets and divested brands like Argentina and Nigeria, while most of its US sales still come from domestic production.

🔗 Source: Reuters


🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ P&G’s pattern of major restructuring follows predictable business cycles

The current job cuts represent the fourth major restructuring at P&G in 25 years, revealing a cyclical pattern in how consumer goods giants respond to market pressures.

In 1999, P&G cut 15,000 jobs globally as part of “Organization 2005,” affecting about 13% of its workforce at that time1.

The company underwent another significant transformation in 2013 when it brought back former CEO A.G. Lafley to address declining sales and market share issues amid changing consumer preferences2.

This was followed by a 2018 reorganization that created six business units structured around product categories rather than geographical regions to improve market responsiveness3.

Each restructuring coincided with specific economic challenges, from market saturation in the late 1990s to the current pressures from tariffs and uncertain consumer spending, demonstrating how even market leaders must periodically reinvent themselves to maintain competitiveness.

The repetitive nature of these restructuring efforts suggests that large consumer goods companies face fundamental industry challenges that require periodic organizational renewal rather than one-time solutions.

2️⃣ Manufacturing resilience amid corporate streamlining reveals strategic priorities

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.