Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

Musk sues OpenAI, Microsoft for up to $134b over early backing

Elon Musk is seeking up to US$134 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming he is entitled to a share of profits from his early support.

Musk said he provided about US$38 million in seed funding, and helped recruit staff and connect founders with contacts.

OpenAI dismissed Musk’s claims as baseless, an unserious demand, and part of a harassment campaign. Microsoft denied aiding OpenAI.

Both companies challenged the damages calculations in court.

Musk, who left OpenAI in 2018 and now runs xAI, alleges OpenAI violated its founding mission by restructuring as a for-profit. A trial is scheduled for April in Oakland, California.

🔗 Source: Reuters

🧠 Food for thought

Implications, context, and why it matters.

Stress test the expert math and legal path behind a $134B disgorgement

  • Ask how an estimated about $38M, about 60% seed stake, grows into $65.5B to $109.4B for OpenAI and $13.3B to $25.1B for Microsoft. Their defense teams call the method unverifiable and unprecedented.
  • Verify whether Musk’s expert links causation and method to accepted valuation tools. That includes Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) multiples or discounted cash flow (DCF). Courts often use those to prove diminution in value in Representations and Warranties (R&W) insurance disputes 1.
  • Probe which legal path allows disgorgement (forcing a defendant to surrender wrongful profits) of wrongful gains from OpenAI, a nonprofit turned for profit, and from Microsoft. The defense says this would be an implausible shift of billions from a nonprofit to a former donor turned competitor.
  • Track rulings on any limits on the expert’s testimony. Those decisions could shape a jury trial set for April in Oakland, where punitive damages or an injunction (a court order to do or stop doing something) may be sought.

Turn litigation risk into revenue with provenance, verification, and valuation readiness

  • AI compliance Software as a Service (SaaS) founders should build provenance (end to end traceability) and license verification dashboards that produce audit ready outputs. The defense bid to toss unverifiable expert work makes verification a decisive credibility test at trial.
  • Private equity and corporate development teams should require portfolio companies to map model lineage (how a model was trained and updated) plus licensing to damages frameworks used in court. That includes breach, loss causation, and EBITDA or DCF defensibility, so claims can survive or defeat scrutiny 1.
  • Cloud marketplaces plus managed service providers (MSPs) can launch certification programs for AI vendors on governance, licensing, and auditability. Use the April jury trial and any possible injunctions to make certification a practical sales requirement.

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.