Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

Korean banks review crypto partnerships after Bithumb bitcoin error

Korean banks are reviewing their partnerships with virtual asset exchanges following a payment error at Bithumb involving 62 trillion won (US$42.78 billion) worth of bitcoin.

KakaoBank and Kbank, which have agreements with exchanges like Coinone and Upbit, are assessing whether to renew their contracts amid concerns over reputational risk.

Bithumb mistakenly paid 620,000 bitcoins to 249 winners but canceled most transactions before recording them on the blockchain, resulting in only 1,788 bitcoins being transferred.

Despite low chances of sanctions from authorities for incidents at exchanges, banks are cautious about potential reputational damage linked to their connections.

KakaoBank plans to renew its yearly partnership with Coinone in Q3, while Kbank is watching the situation ahead of its contract expiration in October.

Kookmin Bank is set to review its contract with Bithumb and is requesting stronger internal controls.

The banks continue to monitor the situation closely.

🔗 Source: Chosunbiz

🧠 Food for thought

Implications, context, and why it matters.

Bank and exchange tie-ups are required for won trading and shape the market

  • Under Korea’s real-name framework, an exchange offering won-denominated trading needs a bank partner that issues real-name deposit and withdrawal accounts 1.
  • The one-exchange-one-bank rule has narrowed competition, leaving top won-trading venues with exclusive partners such as Upbit with Kbank, plus Coinone with KakaoBank 1.
  • Banks worry about reputation, yet walking away can cut off big pools of customer cash. Upbit deposits were 7.49 trillion won ($5.2 billion) at the end of the third quarter last year 1.
  • That pull keeps many banks in these deals, so they push exchanges to tighten internal controls instead of ending the relationship.

Bithumb’s error has sparked tougher checks from regulators

  • Bithumb’s internal ledger mistake still allowed trades to go through, which drew regulators’ attention 2.
  • Afterward, the Financial Services Commission, the Financial Intelligence Unit, plus the Financial Supervisory Service started emergency inspections at other large exchanges including Upbit and Coinone 3.
  • Policy talks now lean toward bank-style oversight, with guardrails like ledger integrity tests, sign-off for promotions, plus reconciliation steps 2.
  • Officials said inspection results will feed into the next phase of the government’s digital asset legislation 3.

Recent Bithumb developments

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.