Japan will not use its US Treasury holdings as leverage in upcoming trade talks with the US, scheduled for April 17.

Itsunori Onodera, policy chief of the Liberal Democratic Party, emphasized that Japan, as a US ally, wants to avoid actions that could disrupt financial markets. “Causing market disruption is certainly not a good idea,” he said.

This announcement follows Japan’s pullback from US Treasuries last week, which caused long-term yields to rise.

The move has sparked speculation that global reserve managers, including China, might reconsider investments in US government debt amid trade tensions.

Japan is seeking an exemption from the US tariffs imposed on April 9, which include a 24% tariff on Japanese goods and a 25% tariff on Japan’s auto industry. The US, in turn, is asking for concessions on agricultural products and LNG.

🔗 Source: Bloomberg

🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ Japan faces unprecedented auto industry impact despite alliance status

Japan’s response to the tariffs reveals the difficult position of a traditional US ally facing significant economic damage.

The 25% tariffs on its vital auto industry could cost Japanese manufacturers an estimated $24 billion according to industry analysis 1.

This represents a serious threat to Japan’s economy, with UN trade agencies projecting potential losses of $17 billion in car exports alone 2.

The Japanese government’s explicit statement that they “would not intentionally take action against U.S. government bonds” highlights their delicate position, needing to defend economic interests while maintaining alliance obligations.

Japan’s automotive industry has relied heavily on exports to the US market, with companies like Toyota and Honda now facing dramatically reduced profitability that threatens their global business models.

2️⃣ New tariffs mark historic shift in US trade policy

The current tariffs represent a significant protectionist shift in American trade policy.

The average effective US tariff rate has risen to 22.5%, reaching levels not seen since 1909 according to economic analysis by Capital Group 3.