Google’s AI-driven answers and updates to its search algorithms have disrupted traffic for independent website publishers.

Many report major declines, with some losing over 70% of their traffic, according to Bloomberg. This drop has led to financial losses, reduced ad revenue, and even site closures.

A key factor is Google’s AI Overviews, which summarize content directly in search results, reducing the need for users to visit original websites.

Google, however, claims the decline is due to other factors like changing user behavior, seasonal demand, and algorithm updates.

A study by Similarweb showed that small to mid-sized websites in sectors like travel, fashion, cooking, and DIY have seen consistent traffic drops over the past two years.

The travel sector, where Google has heavily implemented AI features, saw the steepest decline.

Publishers like Morgan McBride of Charleston Crafted reported a 65% drop in ad revenue, blaming Google’s AI answers. Some believe the changes favor large media brands over smaller sites.

🔗 Source: Bloomberg

🧠 Food for thought

A. Platform dependency creates recurring cycles of disruption for content creators

The significant traffic drops reported by website owners like Morgan McBride (70%+ decline) follow a well-documented pattern where algorithm changes create sudden business disruptions.

This mirrors the documented impact of Facebook’s 2018 algorithm change, which caused some publishers to lose up to 80% of their traffic and led to the shutdown of sites like LittleThings after it lost 75% of its audience1.

Similar patterns emerged in the MENA region, where independent publishers lost up to 80% of their audience following Facebook’s algorithm shifts and subsequent withdrawal from news distribution2.

The cyclical nature of these disruptions demonstrates that dependency on any single platform creates specific business vulnerabilities, regardless of content quality or adherence to platform guidelines.

What’s particularly striking is that these traffic collapses often affect creators who have closely followed platform guidance, such as the group invited to Google headquarters who were told their sites represented exactly the kind of helpful content Google wanted to surface.

Historical data shows that recovery from algorithm impacts is inconsistent and often incomplete, with “false positives” (high-quality sites mistakenly penalized) struggling to regain their previous positions3.

Recent Google developments