Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

Google ordered to pay $425m in privacy class action lawsuit

A federal jury in San Francisco has ordered Google to pay US$425 million in a class action lawsuit over privacy violations.

The case involved allegations that Google collected and used data from millions of users who had disabled a tracking feature in their accounts over an eight-year period.

The jury found Google liable on two out of three privacy claims but did not award punitive damages, saying the company had not acted with malice.

Google plans to appeal, arguing that the data was encrypted and not linked to individual users.

The lawsuit covers around 98 million users and 174 million devices. Users had sought more than US$31 billion in damages.

Google has faced other privacy lawsuits, including a US$1.4 billion settlement with Texas and an April 2024 agreement to delete billions of private browsing records.

🔗 Source: Reuters


🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ Google’s privacy penalties show escalating pattern over more than a decade

The $425 million verdict represents the latest in a series of privacy-related penalties that have grown substantially over time.

Google previously paid $170 million in 2019 for violating children’s privacy laws on YouTube1, $39.5 million for cookie placement violations2, and $22.5 million in 2012 for misleading Safari users about tracking practices3.

This progression from $22.5 million to $425 million over 13 years suggests that regulatory enforcement is becoming more aggressive, even as Google’s practices have continued to raise privacy concerns.

The pattern spans multiple jurisdictions and violation types, from children’s data collection to location tracking to web browsing surveillance, indicating these aren’t isolated incidents but part of broader data collection practices.

2️⃣ User control settings create widespread confusion about actual data collection

The current case highlights a fundamental disconnect between what users believe privacy settings accomplish versus what actually happens behind the scenes.

Similar confusion emerged in Google’s Australian case, where the ACCC alleged users believed turning off “Location History” would stop all location data collection, when in fact both “Location History” and “Web & App Activity” settings needed to be disabled4.

Recent Google developments

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.