Epic Games has won a significant ruling in its legal dispute with Apple, which may allow Fortnite to return to the US iOS App Store soon.

The decision was made by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on April 30, 2025.

The judge found that Apple was in “willful violation” of a 2021 injunction that prohibited the company from enforcing anticompetitive pricing practices.

This injunction required Apple to permit app developers to direct customers to external websites for purchases, avoiding Apple’s commission fees.

The court concluded that Apple intentionally failed to comply with this order, imposing additional barriers for developers.

🔗 Source: TechCrunch

🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ A landmark shift in tech antitrust enforcement with historical parallels

Judge Rogers’ stern language calling Apple’s violation “willful” and referring the case for possible criminal contempt represents a significant escalation in how courts are approaching tech platform regulation.

This ruling continues a pattern of increasing judicial scrutiny of Apple’s marketplace practices that began with the 2013 e-book price-fixing case, where Apple was eventually ordered to pay $450 million in damages after the Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling 1.

The judge’s pointed statement that “there is no second bite at the apple” reflects growing judicial impatience with tech giants’ attempts to circumvent competition rulings. This case marks the third major antitrust setback for Apple in recent years, following the 2019 Supreme Court ruling in Apple v. Pepper that allowed consumers to sue Apple directly for monopolistic App Store practices, creating a legal precedent that expands who can bring antitrust claims against digital platforms 2.

The unusually strong language in the ruling suggests courts are adopting a stricter interpretation of compliance requirements for tech companies, potentially influencing how similar cases will be handled globally.

2️⃣ Economic ripple effects demonstrate the power of app store policies

The immediate market response to the ruling demonstrates how significant Apple’s App Store policies are to the broader digital economy, affecting companies far beyond just Epic Games.

Spotify’s rapid announcement that they would “move quickly to submit an app update” highlights how Apple’s policies had been constraining major services across the ecosystem 3.

There’s substantial economic impact at stake—previous evidence in Apple’s e-book antitrust case showed that controlled pricing led to average price increases of 18% for consumers 4. The ruling directly attacks Apple’s fee structure, which research has shown can significantly impact consumer prices.

Recent Apple developments