OpenAI and io, a company led by Jony Ive, are involved in a legal dispute over trademark infringement allegations from iyO, a hardware startup supported by Google.

The lawsuit was filed earlier this month and centers on claims related to OpenAI’s US$6.5 billion acquisition of io and its promotional materials, which were withdrawn following a court order.

Legal documents indicate that OpenAI and io are researching AI hardware devices, including in-ear technology.

The companies reportedly purchased 30 headphone sets for market research and held discussions with iyO’s leadership to present their developments.

However, io’s chief hardware officer, Tang Tan, clarified in court documents that their prototype is not classified as an in-ear or wearable device, as its design is still being finalized.

The specific design of the device remains uncertain. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman suggested it could serve as a “third device” for consumers, complementing smartphones and laptops.

He noted that the product would be portable and environmentally aware, while Jony Ive mentioned that the prototype has generated interest.

🔗 Source: TechCrunch

🧠 Food for thought

1️⃣ AI hardware market heats up as major tech players diversify beyond traditional form factors

OpenAI and io’s collaboration represents a growing trend of companies exploring novel AI device formats beyond the familiar smartphone or laptop paradigm.

The global AI hardware market is projected to expand dramatically from $34.05 billion in 2025 to $210.50 billion by 2034, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 22.43% 1.

This growth is driving intense competition across the entire AI stack, with established firms and startups all vying for market share in what has become a highly contested space 2.

While smart glasses have emerged as an early front-runner for AI-enabled wearables, companies are increasingly exploring diverse form factors. Tang Tan’s statement that io’s prototype is “not an in-ear device, nor a wearable device” suggests OpenAI is pursuing a different direction than competitors.

The race to define the next generation of AI devices reflects the broader industry trend toward edge AI, which enables devices to process data locally and reduce latency. This could be critical for the “surroundings-aware” functionality Altman described 3.

2️⃣ Trademark disputes signal the increasing value of AI intellectual property