🧔♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here
Australia deactivates 4.7 million under-16 social media accounts
Over 4.7 million Australian social media accounts were deactivated within two days of the December 10 law banning users under 16, according to government data.
Platforms such as TikTok, Snapchat, and Instagram provided data to the Office of the eSafety Commissioner, which is reviewing compliance.
Meta reported removing over 500,000 accounts, including 330,000 from Instagram and 173,000 from Facebook.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the early data “encouraging,” while Communications Minister Anika Wells described the figures as a “huge achievement.”
Meta criticized the age restriction, saying it limits support for vulnerable teens and pushes them to less-regulated apps.
🔗 Source: Australian Broadcasting Corporation
🧠 Food for thought
Implications, context, and why it matters.
Scrutinize the 4.7 million deactivations for who, how, and how reliable
- Australia’s under‑16 social media ban started on December 10, with more than 4.7 million deactivations in the first two days, and the eSafety Commissioner is reviewing platform data for compliance.
- Request a platform split for the two‑day total. Meta reported 330,000 on Instagram, 173,000 on Facebook, and 39,000 on Threads for Dec 4–11. Most removals likely came from other services or non‑matching dates.
- Pin down which age checks were used and at what accuracy. Acceptable options include facial age estimation, contextual inference, and ID verification 1. No method is mandated.
- Confirm safeguards for removed users. Look for clear notice, data download, support signposts, and a right to review. eSafety requires these under the scheme 2.
- Test blocks on fast re‑registration and evasion. That covers virtual private networks (VPNs) and fake accounts. The scheme requires ongoing detection 2.
- Track the reporting timetable. Platforms file initial data then six months of monthly updates, with penalties up to about AUD 49.5 million for misses 3.
Build privacy-first age assurance and audit rails as demand spikes
- Age‑assurance startups can ship ID‑free checks like facial age estimation or inference. Platforms cannot demand government ID as the only path and must offer privacy‑preserving choices 1.
- SDK and back‑end vendors need layered, risk‑based toolkits with VPN and duplicate‑account monitoring 4. The Age Assurance Technology Trial is a multi‑stakeholder program that evaluates the effectiveness and privacy impact of age‑verification approaches 4.
- Compliance and audit firms can prepare “reasonable steps” packs with records, improvement logs, and privacy assessments to meet documentation rules 2. Penalties can reach about AUD 49.5 million 3.
- Global compliance platforms should add geolocation and residency checks for children ordinarily resident in Australia 1. Keep verification data ring‑fenced from ads or product systems and delete it once no longer needed 4.
- All vendors must plan for volume. Two‑day deactivations of 4.7 million signal demand spikes, so build scalable onboarding and appeal flows that handle re‑verification without heavy removal friction.
Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.
Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.




