🧔♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here
20% of Australian teens still use TikTok, Snapchat after ban: report
One-fifth of Australian teens still use TikTok and Snapchat after minimum age rise
Qustodio, a parental-control software maker, said about 20% of Australians aged 13 to 15 still used each of TikTok and Snapchat two months after the government raised the minimum social media age to 16 and required platforms to block under-16s.
The company provided data from late 2024 to February showing Snapchat use fell to 20.3% and TikTok to 21.2% among 13- to 15-year-olds.
Qustodio said YouTube use in that group dipped to 36.9% but its data did not show whether users were logged into accounts.
The eSafety Commissioner said it was aware some under-16s remained on social media and was actively engaging with platforms and age-assurance providers while monitoring for breaches.
Platforms face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$33 million) for non-compliance under the law.
The data showed little migration to unregulated platforms, though WhatsApp use rose slightly among 13- to 15-year-olds.
🧠 Food for thought
Implications, context, and why it matters.
Millions of under-16 accounts were removed before Qustodio found about 20% still using TikTok and Snapchat
- The ~20% figure refers to Australians aged 13 to 15 whom Qustodio data found still using TikTok and Snapchat about two months after the government lifted the minimum social media age to 16 and required services to block under-16s.
- Australia’s eSafety Commissioner (the country’s online safety regulator) said 4.7 million social media accounts tied to children under 16 were removed in the first half of December 2025 1.
- Meta (the owner of Facebook and Instagram) said it blocked about 550,000 accounts it believed belonged to under-16s across Instagram, Facebook, and Threads in early December 2025 2.
- To comply, companies must take “reasonable steps” to keep under-16s off their services using multiple age-assurance technologies. They cannot rely on self-certification or parents vouching for children 2.
- Approaches include linking to bank accounts, submitting photo IDs, and facial age estimation. These tools help explain mass removals, plus why some teens still get around the ban 3.
Australia’s ban is a global test case for age-gated social media access
- Australia’s law has become a global test case, influencing proposals or moves in Spain and the U.K. Malaysia said it would ban social media accounts for children younger than 16 from 2026 1.
- This shift strains the one-size-fits-all approach used by global apps. Meta argues age checks plus parental approval should happen at the app store level, which would move more responsibility to app stores 4.
- Compliance pressure is opening a market for age verification technology. It also fuels debate about online anonymity and surveillance 5.
- Critics warn these systems can push firms to collect sensitive data including biometrics (such as facial scans), which could harm privacy and support tracking or censorship. Others argue the law aimed to limit reliance on government IDs alone, which may push providers toward biometric tools 6.
🔗 Source: Reuters
Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.
Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.




