Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
Nivedita Bhattacharjee · · 10 min read

India’s big exit mess and what we can learn from it

funding, secret, elephant, room,

Photo credit: vicnt / 123RF.

There is a huge problem looming over startup investors in India, and not enough is being said about it.

India’s startups have seen a funny turn of events of late, with storied founders asking for government protection, and revered investors making charges of “capital dumping” by foreign companies – only to be torn apart by colleagues in the industry.

Getting lost in this noise is the most important issue at hand – and, according to some, the real reason why these “debates” happened in the first place. It is a story of worried investors, writeoffs, and few exit routes for the money that has gone into building the third biggest entrepreneur hub after the United States and the United Kingdom.

“When the valuation bubble deflates, investors get hurt. Some late-stage investors won’t even get their principal back. Early-stage investors will do better. But they too will have to eat humble pie as they write down their previous mark-to-market valuations,” said Sharad Sharma, co-founder of iSPIRT.

A total of US$8.23 billion was pumped into startups in India in 2015. In 2016, that number fell to US$4.07 billion, according to Tracxn.

While 152 startups were acquired in 2015, the total acquisition amount was of around just US$1 billion, says the startup research firm. (Tracxn only calculated deals that were officially announced.) In 2016, the deal number rose to 160, bringing in about US$1.2 billion.

As valuations get shaky, and profits and IPOs become more elusive, many investors are now stuck, looking for exits via deals and mergers and acquisitions.

Asking more questions

Photo credit: Mike Poresky.

Tech in Asia spoke to multiple investors to gauge their sentiments about possible exit routes. Most of them did not want to be named because either their firms have active investments in the startups we discussed, or because they aren’t officially allowed to talk to the media.

“It is a fiduciary duty for VCs to show an exit path. But at this point, there is none,” said a source at a VC firm. “Big VCs are still raising funds, but investors are asking more questions.”

Herd mentality jacked up valuations.

The problem, they explained, is that business models like online shopping or ride-hailing are highly competitive, with comparatively low barriers to entry. (Read: it isn’t that hard to copy).

Stuck

Quagmire

Reputation

Lessons

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.

Community Writer

Nivedita Bhattacharjee

Associate Editor, TIA India. Love good apps, tech, books and food. Believer in brevity. Old school in matters of ethics. Tips @tweetsfromnivi or nivedita@techinasia.com