🧔♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here
TikTok, Bigo follow Indonesia child-safety rules, X lags
TikTok and Bigo Live were observed using parental or responsible-account consent checks for child users under Indonesia’s Government Regulation No. 17/2025 concerning child protection in the implementation of electronic systems (PP Tunas), while X still allowed account sign-ups without consent, based on research.
The test used a 9-year-old child account and a Google account set up with parent approval tools before trying sign-ups across platforms.
TikTok prompted the user to add a parent or guardian account and required the responsible account password before the child account could proceed.
Bigo Live also flagged its service as for users aged 18 and over and showed a similar prompt for a responsible account, while X did not ask for parental approval during registration.
🔗 Source: Bisnis Indonesia
🧠 Food for thought
Implications, context, and why it matters.
Indonesia’s child safety law covers more than age checks
- Government Regulation No. 17/2025 on child protection in electronic systems (PP Tunas) sets five child age brackets, starting at ages 3 to 5 1.
- For a 9-year-old account, a platform must collect parental or responsible-account consent, set high-privacy defaults, and avoid “dark patterns” (deceptive design tactics that trick users into choices they might not otherwise make) 1.
- The rules apply to more than TikTok, Bigo Live, and X. They cover all electronic system operators (ESOs), including online games like Roblox and e-commerce sites 2.
- Rollout will vary because the government allows a two-year transition period until March 2027. Administrative penalties start after that, so X and others have time to adjust 1.
Indonesia’s law fits a worldwide move toward platform responsibility
- Indonesia joins a wider push on child safety. Australia’s ban on social media for children under 16 took effect in December 2025 3.
- Policymakers now push platforms to fix design-level concerns, including limits on default user profiling plus privacy from the start 2.
- Global tech firms face tougher product work. Local rules keep diverging, which weakens a single global setup 1.
- Enforcement may decide the outcome. Without a strong, independent body like Australia’s eSafety Commissioner (the country’s online safety regulator), Indonesia’s law could end up as a “paper tiger” 4.
Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.
Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.




