Tired of ads? Enjoy an ad-free experience by signing up.
👩‍🍳 How we use AI at Tech in Asia, thoughtfully and responsibly.
🧔‍♂️ A friendly human may check it before it goes live. More news here

Chinese quant fund Ubiquant unveils code LLMs, rivals OpenAI

Beijing-based Ubiquant has announced a family of open-source, code-focused large language models (LLMs) that it says rival leading US systems in benchmark tests.

Ubiquant, one of China’s largest quantitative trading funds, reported that its IQuest-Coder-V1 models performed on par with or better than OpenAI’s GPT-5.1, and Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.5, in several programming benchmarks, despite having fewer parameters.

The firm cited scores such as 76.2% on SWE-bench Verified, 49.9% on BigCodeBench, and 81.1% on LiveCodeBench for its 40-billion-parameter model, based on internal testing.

Ubiquant manages over US$10 billion in assets and was among the first Chinese quant funds to apply AI at scale for investment.

Other Chinese quant trading firms, including High-Flyer Quant, Goku Technologies, Mingshi, Wizard Quant, and Mengxi Investment, have also increased their AI development efforts in the wake of DeepSeek’s rise in the LLM field.

🔗 Source: South China Morning Post

🧠 Food for thought

Implications, context, and why it matters.

US parity claims need public leaderboard checks

  • Ubiquant says IQuest-Coder-V1 hits 76.2% on SWE-bench Verified (a benchmark that evaluates whether a model can resolve real-world software issues in code repositories under controlled conditions) 1, which trails Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.2% 2. These are in-house runs so public checks are needed.
  • They clarified and re-ran SWE-bench Verified 1. No public leaderboard entry exists so 76.2% may not match prompts, context limits, or tool settings.
  • The data includes commits, pull requests, and review comments (developer feedback) rather than static snapshots 2. That could lift results if it generalizes beyond memorization.
  • Without third-party checks on public leaderboards, developers will struggle to judge real performance versus marketing.

Dev tool vendors can explore cost gains if models prove viable

  • AI infrastructure providers could adopt the 40 billion-parameter IQuest-Coder-V1 1 to cut API spend versus GPT-5.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 if the weights (the model parameters) are open and licensed for business use.
  • Quantized builds include 4-bit 3 and 2-bit to 8-bit formats 4 for runs on local or edge hardware. Quantized means reducing numerical precision to shrink size and speed up inference, with minor accuracy trade-offs.
  • Teams can serve it with vLLM (an open-source inference engine that serves models via an OpenAI-style API) for OpenAI-compatible endpoints 1 to plug into tools that call US APIs.
  • Adoption still hinges on license terms for commercial use, measured costs or latency on common hardware, plus proof that results hold up outside controlled tests.

Stay ahead in Asia’s tech landscape

You've reached your 2 free content limit for the month. Sign up for free to read the full story.

🏄 For casual readers / 👶 Free

Basic

US$0

Free forever

Get instant access to this article and more every month

0 premium content

Unlimited news briefs

5

5 articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0 per day

⌛Sign up in 20s. No payment details needed.

📖 For learners / 👍 Starter

Lite

US$4.92/month

Billed annually at US$59/year

Get instant access to this article and more every month

4

4 premium content

Unlimited news briefs & articles

Ad-free reading experience

Just US$0.17 per day

Cancel anytime

Our subscriber community includes professionals from these companies:

Stay updated on the go with our mobile app.

Get latest insights with smoother, more personalized experience through TIA mobile app.